Last updated: May 2026 — James Wilson, Rs Project
At Rs Project (rs-project.org), every review published on this site is the result of a thorough, hands-on evaluation process carried out personally by James Wilson. This page explains exactly how we assess Mostbet and similar platforms operating in the AZ market, so you always know what sits behind every score and recommendation you read here.
Our goal is simple: give players in Azerbaijan honest, accurate, and independent information so they can make informed decisions before depositing real money. We do not accept payments from operators in exchange for favorable ratings. Every conclusion you read reflects genuine testing, not commercial arrangement.
Before James Wilson spends a single minute testing a platform, he verifies its legal standing. This means checking license documentation, confirming the issuing authority is reputable, and cross-referencing the operator against known blacklists or player complaint databases. Any site that fails this first checkpoint does not proceed to a full review.
James Wilson personally registers an account using standard player credentials — no special press accounts, no operator-provided demo access. He deposits real money, claims available bonuses, plays a selection of games, and attempts a withdrawal. This hands-on approach is the only reliable way to identify friction points that matter to real players: slow verification, hidden wagering hurdles, or delayed payouts.
Once live testing is complete, each platform is scored across six defined categories. Every category carries a fixed percentage weighting that reflects its importance to player experience and safety. Scores are recorded independently before any final rating is calculated.
All factual claims — bonus terms, payment limits, support response times — are verified a second time against current platform documentation before the review is published. Reviews are dated and updated whenever significant changes occur on the platform side.
Our overall score is a weighted average across six categories. Here is how each one is defined and why it carries the weight it does:
| Category | Weighting | What We Evaluate |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing & Safety | 25% | Valid gambling license, SSL encryption, responsible gambling tools, fair dispute resolution processes |
| Bonuses & Promotions | 20% | Welcome offer value, wagering requirements, bonus terms clarity, ongoing promotions for existing players |
| Game Selection | 20% | Variety of casino games and sports markets, software provider quality, RTP transparency, live dealer options |
| Payment Methods | 15% | Deposit and withdrawal options available in AZ, processing times, fees, minimum and maximum limits |
| Customer Support | 10% | Availability of live chat, email, and phone support, response speed, quality of answers during test queries |
| Mobile Experience | 10% | Quality of dedicated app or mobile browser version, loading speed, navigation, full feature availability on mobile |
Every category and every final review receives a score on a scale of 1 to 10, defined as follows:
A site must score at least 7 out of 10 overall to receive a positive recommendation on Rs Project. Licensing and Safety is treated as a threshold category — a score below 5 in this category results in an automatic overall rating cap, regardless of scores elsewhere.
Independence is the foundation of everything we publish. Here is how we protect it:
James Wilson has been researching and writing about online gambling platforms since 2019, with a specific focus on markets across the AZ region. His reviews combine direct product testing with ongoing monitoring of regulatory developments. All content published on Rs Project in 2026 reflects his current, independent assessment based on the methodology described on this page.
If you have questions about our review process or wish to flag information that may be inaccurate, you are welcome to contact us directly through the contact page on rs-project.org.